![]() ![]() ![]() If a falsification was made, it probably took place at the time of John XXIII, who was the Pope targeted to receive the message, open it and make it public.Why would he do this? I will try to answer this question during my analysis. He also kept the same words written by Sr. If some falsifier entered the picture, he maintained the same number of lines and paragraphs as the original message of Sr.It is the fruit of this labor that I pass on to my readers in this article.īefore starting, let me say that the analysis that follows has four presuppositions: Some days ago I started to scrutinize that “Third Secret” looking for more traces of a possible falsification. I always had suspicions regarding the date Ap(line 1), April Fools’ Day, which most probably should have been January 4, 1944, and by the ill-sounding expression “the Cathedral of Rome” (line 21), which to make sense should be “ Cathedra or Chair of Rome” signifying the Holy See. Note: To follow this analysis in an easier way, print the larger text here ![]() Encouraged by the verdict of a famed Spanish graphologist affirming the authenticity of the Sister Lucy’s handwriting in the “Third Secret’ of Fatima we posted in April 2010 on our website, I have returned to analyze it more carefully. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
May 2023
Categories |